Get Prepared for Your CAMS Exam With Actual 859 Questions [Q115-Q135]

06Aug 2025 by admin No Comments

4.6/5 - (5 votes)

Get Prepared for Your CAMS Exam With Actual 859 Questions

Valid CAMS Test Answers Full-length Practice Certification Exams

Obtaining the CAMS certification demonstrates a commitment to professional development and a deep understanding of the AML industry. Certified Anti-Money Laundering Specialists certification is recognized globally and can enhance career opportunities and earning potential. Additionally, CAMS certified professionals are better equipped to protect their organizations from financial crimes and help maintain the integrity of the global financial system.

NEW QUESTION 115
Which factors should lead to a reassessment of the current AML program? (Select Two.)

Expansion of business to new territories

Appointment of a new Chief Financial Officer

Change of company name

Change of internal audit team members

New product offering

According to the ACAMS CAMS Study Guide, 6th Edition, Chapter 2, Section 2.1, the AML program should be reassessed periodically or when there are significant changes in the business environment, such as:
Expansion of business to new territories: This could expose the business to new risks, regulations, and customers that require different AML policies, procedures, and controls. The AML program should be updated to reflect the new jurisdictions and their AML requirements, as well as to conduct appropriate risk assessments and due diligence on the new markets and customers.
New product offering: This could introduce new vulnerabilities, opportunities, and challenges for the AML program. The AML program should be revised to incorporate the new product features, benefits, and risks, as well as to ensure compliance with any applicable AML rules and standards for the new product.
The other options are not factors that would necessarily lead to a reassessment of the current AML program, unless they have a material impact on the AML risks, objectives, or performance of the business:
Appointment of a new Chief Financial Officer: This could affect the AML program if the new CFO has a different vision, strategy, or approach to AML than the previous one, or if the new CFO has a significant role or responsibility in the AML program. However, the appointment of a new CFO alone does not trigger a reassessment of the AML program, unless there are other changes or issues that warrant a review.
Change of company name: This could affect the AML program if the change of name reflects a change of ownership, structure, or nature of the business that could alter the AML risks, obligations, or expectations. However, the change of name alone does not necessitate a reassessment of the AML program, unless there are other implications or consequences that affect the AML program.
Change of internal audit team members: This could affect the AML program if the new internal audit team members have different qualifications, skills, or experiences than the previous ones, or if the new internal audit team members have a different scope, methodology, or frequency of auditing the AML program. However, the change of internal audit team members alone does not require a reassessment of the AML program, unless there are other factors or findings that indicate a need for a review.
References:
ACAMS CAMS Study Guide, 6th Edition, Chapter 2, Section 2.1
ACAMS CAMS Certification Video Training Course – Exam-Labs
Exam CAMS: Certified Anti-Money Laundering Specialist (the 6th edition)

NEW QUESTION 116
Which action indicates possible Penza scheme activity?

A licensed seller offers higher profit on investments in a high risk country

An unlicensed investment advisor offers profits other investments cannot guarantee

A licensed investment advisor lures aging/retired professionals to invest in securities

A unlicensed investment advisor offers returns that are competitive with industry benchmarks

NEW QUESTION 117
A non-U.S. bank wants to open an account at Bank A, which is a U.S.-based bank.
Which information must Bank A obtain under the USA PATRIOT Act?

A complete client list from the non-U.S. bank

The identity of owners and percentage of ownership of the non-U.S. bank

The structure and identity of the management team at the non-U.S. bank

The details of the non-U.S. bank’s anti-money laundering compliance training program

NEW QUESTION 118
A new compliance officer is reviewing the bank’s anti-money laundering program and notices that the risk assessment was completed six months ago. Since that time, the bank acquired another financial institution, renamed the internal records group, and streamlined cash handling procedures.
Which factor causes the compliance officer to update the bank’s risk assessment?

The bank acquired another institution

The internal records group has been re-named

The cash handling procedures were streamlined

The risk assessment was completed six months ago

NEW QUESTION 119
the Financing of Terrorism (CFT)]
Which step should be taken to understand the types of financial institutions to whom the services are being offered when a correspondent bank permits “nested” relationships according to the Wolfsberg Group?

Review peer-group clients by risk category

Understand the type and volume of accounts serviced

Evaluate the distribution of downstream correspondents and identify any direct or indirect issues

Obtain independent audits or examination reports for “nested” relationships to determine risk levels

NEW QUESTION 120
Which are characteristics of Mutual Legal Assistance Treaties (MLATs)? (Select Three.)

MLATs are neither public nor binding under international law.

MLATs cannot be used for obtaining banking records from treaty partners.

MLATs do not provide a legal basis for transmitting evidence.

MLATs only involve two countries.

MLATs cooperatively combat crime between countries.

MLATs are useful for gathering evidence and intelligence in a foreign country.

NEW QUESTION 121
During a law enforcement investigative interview regarding potential money laundering, the suspect starts making assertions and statements that the investigator believes are false.
How should the investigator respond?

Inform the suspect that deception is obvious and continue the interview

Advise the suspect that the interview will be terminated if there is suspicion of deception

Direct the interview in another direction until there is better rapport before returning back to the troubling question

Ask question of a material nature about the suspected false statements without revealing the suspected deception

QUEAccording to the ACAMS Study Guide, one of the skills of an effective AML investigator is to conduct investigative interviews using appropriate techniques and methods1. One of the techniques is to use open- ended questions that elicit detailed responses from the interviewee, and to avoid leading or suggestive questions that may reveal the investigator’s assumptions or suspicions1. Therefore, the best option is to ask question of a material nature about the suspected false statements without revealing the suspected deception, as this would allow the investigator to gather more information and evidence, and to test the consistency and credibility of the interviewee’s answers.
The other options are not advisable or effective, because:
* A. Informing the suspect that deception is obvious and continuing the interview is not a good strategy, because it may antagonize the suspect and make them less cooperative or more defensive. It may also alert the suspect to the investigator’s knowledge and sources, and give them an opportunity to change or modify their story2.
* B. Advising the suspect that the interview will be terminated if there is suspicion of deception is not a good strategy, because it may create a negative impression of the investigator and the investigation, and it may discourage the suspect from providing any useful information. It may also imply that the investigator has insufficient evidence or authority to pursue the case2.
* C. Directing the interview in another direction until there is better rapport before returning back to the troubling question is not a good strategy, because it may waste time and resources, and it may lose the focus and momentum of the investigation. It may also signal to thesuspect that the investigator is not confident or competent, and it may give the suspect a chance to prepare or rehearse their answers2.
:
1: ACAMS Study Guide, 6th Edition, Chapter 4: Conducting and Supporting the Investigation, page
105. 2: 46 AML Investigator Interview Questions (And Sample Answers)

NEW QUESTION 122
In addition to monitoring for suspicious activity, what are electronic monitoring systems also valuable for?

Identifying how customers are using products

Highlighting the skills of the system analysts

Proving to the Board of Directors that the FIU is doing its job

Meeting mandatory regulatory requirements for system implementation

NEW QUESTION 123
What is acore function of a Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU)as described inFATF Recommendation 29?

Serving as a national centerfor thecollection and analysis of suspicious activity.

Prosecuting significant cases of money launderingor terrorist financing under national jurisdiction.

Sponsoring the research and developmentof advanced technological surveillance tools for AML investigations.

Sharing real-time criminal intelligencegathered from national law enforcement agencies with the private sector.

NEW QUESTION 124
A financial institution (FI) is being investigated for possible money laundering. When cooperating with law enforcement agencies, which additional steps should the FI ensure are taken? (Choose two.)

Centralized control is maintained over all requests and responses to ensure completeness and timely responses.

Make employees, including corporate officers, unavailable for interviews and refuse documents upon receipt of a subpoena.

Subpoenas and other information requests should be reviewed by senior management and an investigations group or counsel.

Address the document destruction policy to ensure the relevant documents are destroyed.

Inquiries from the media are not answered directly, but rather are addressed by replying, “No comment.”

When an FI is being investigated for possible money laundering, it is important that it cooperates with the law enforcement agencies (LEAs) in a professional and transparent manner. This means that the FI should take the following steps:
* Maintain centralized control over all requests and responses to ensure completeness and timely responses. This will help the FI to avoid duplication, inconsistency, or omission of information, as well as to track the status and progress of the requests and responses. It will also facilitate the communication and coordination between the FI and the LEAs, and demonstrate the FI’s willingness to cooperate12.
* Review subpoenas and other information requests by senior management and an investigations group or counsel. This will help the FI to assess the scope, relevance, and legality of the requests, as well as to identify any potential risks, conflicts, or sensitivities. It will also enable the FI to prepare and provide the requested information in an accurate and timely manner, and to seek clarification or negotiation if necessary13.
The other options are not advisable, as they may indicate a lack of cooperation, obstruct the investigation, or damage the FI’s reputation. For example:
* Making employees, including corporate officers, unavailable for interviews and refusing documents upon receipt of a subpoena may be considered as non-compliance, evasion, or contempt of court, and may result in legal sanctions or penalties4.
* Addressing the document destruction policy to ensure the relevant documents are destroyed may be seen as tampering with evidence, destroying records, or concealing information, and may constitute a criminal offence or a breach of regulatory obligations5.
* Not answering inquiries from the media directly, but rather replying, “No comment” may create a negative impression, fuel speculation, or invite criticism, and may harm the FI’s image, credibility, or trustworthiness.
Cooperation between FIUs, Law Enforcement Authorities, and Prosecutors
AML and Financial crimes investigation
Mechanisms for interaction of law enforcement agencies in the field of counteracting and combating money laundering Recommendation 30: Responsibilities of law enforcement and investigative authorities Money laundering and illicit finance

NEW QUESTION 125
A foreign bank’s compliance officer receives a request for information from a US bank, alerting the foreign bank to the possibility that it may have transferred funds on behalf of an Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC>-sanctioned person, who holds an account with the foreign bank. Which statements are true with respect to said funds and the information in relation to the transaction under scrutiny? (Select Two.)

If the funds are seized, then the foreign bank would be within its rights to dispute such seizure.

US authorities have no power (in terms of the USA PATRIOT Act) to sanction the foreign bank for transferring funds on behalf of an OFAC-sanctioned entity.

The USA PATRIOT Act authorizes the Secretary of the Treasury or the Attorney General to subpoena records from the foreign bank that maintains a correspondent account with a US bank,

If a US citizen were part of the foreign bank’s Board deliberations where a decision was made to onboard the OFAC-sanctioned entity as a client, then they can be confronted with criminal charges.

US authorities are only permitted to seize the funds transferred by the foreign bank under OFAC sanctions if there is an equivalent sanctions regime of the UN which has been contravened.

NEW QUESTION 126
What was cited by the Wolfsberg Group in its Statement on the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism as being vulnerable to terrorist financing?

Private banking

Correspondent banking

Alternative remittance

Trade finance

NEW QUESTION 127
Combating the Financing of Terrorism (CFT)]
Which product type is subject to US extra-jurisdictional reach over non-US banks and non-US persons under the USA PATRIOT Act?

Commercial lending

Correspondent banking

Trade finance

Private banking

NEW QUESTION 128
What are two risks to institutions for violating anti-money laundering laws as demonstrated by the 2012 HSBC settlement with United States authorities? (Choose two.)

Forfeiture of assets

Civil money penalties

Loss of bank charter/license

Imprisonment of bank employees

Institutions that violate anti-money laundering laws may face various risks and consequences, such as legal, regulatory, reputational, and operational risks. As demonstrated by the 2012 HSBC settlement with United States authorities, two of the most significant risks are:
* Forfeiture of assets. This means that the institution may have to surrender some or all of its assets that are related to the money laundering activities or violations. For example, HSBC agreed to forfeit $1.256 billion as part of its deferred prosecution agreement with the US Department of Justice1.
* Civil money penalties. This means that the institution may have to pay fines or penalties to the government or other regulatory agencies for violating the anti-money laundering laws or regulations. For example, HSBC agreed to pay $665 million in civil money penalties to various US regulators, including the Office of Foreign Assets Control, the Federal Reserve Board, and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency1.
The other two options, C and D, are not as common or relevant to the 2012 HSBC settlement. Loss of bank charter/license may occur in extreme cases where the institution is deemed unfit to operate or poses a serious threat to the financial system. Imprisonment of bank employees may occur if the employees are found guilty of criminal charges, such as fraud, conspiracy, or wilful violation of anti-money laundering laws. However, these outcomes are usually reserved for individuals, not institutions, and depend on the specific facts and circumstances of each case.
:
1: HSBC announces settlements with authorities, 2012, https://www.hsbc.com/-/files/hsbc/investors/stock- exchange-announcements/2012/december/2012-12-11-hsbc-announces-settlements-with-authorities.pdf
2: Settlement Agreement between the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control and HSBC Holdings plc, 2012, https://ofac.treasury.gov/recent-actions/20121211_33
3: HSBC settles on record US fee, 2012, https://www.dw.com/en/hsbc-settles-in-us-money-laundering-probe
/a-16443391
4: HSBC pays record $1.9bn fine to settle US money-laundering accusations, 2012, https://www.theguardian.
com/business/2012/dec/11/hsbc-bank-us-money-laundering
5: HSBC to pay $1.9bn in US money laundering penalties, 2012, https://www.bbc.com/news/business-
20673466

NEW QUESTION 129
Section 319(a) of the USA PATRIOT Act:

Allows the appropriate federal banking agency to require a financial organization to produce, within 120 hours, records or information related to the organization’s AML compliance or related to a customer of the organization or any account opened, maintained, administered, or managed in the U.S. by the financial organization.

Provides the U.S. Department of Treasury with the authority to apply graduated, proportionate measures against a foreign jurisdiction, foreign financial organization, type of international transaction, or type of account.

Permits the U.S. Government to seize funds from a correspondent bank account in the U.S. that has been opened and maintained for a foreign bank in the same amount as has been deposited with the foreign bank.

Requires due diligence, and in certain situations enhanced due diligence (EDD), for foreign correspondent accounts, which includes virtually all account relationships that organizations can have with a foreign financial organization and private banking for non-citizens of the U.S.

NEW QUESTION 130
Law enforcement submitted a request to a bank for information regarding one of its customers.
How should the bank respond according to Financial Action Task Force Guidance?

Provide all information requested to support the investigation

Ensure that the request will not violate any local privacy regulations or legislation

Ensure the information is necessary to the investigation before responding to the request

Contact the customer informing the person of the investigation to ensure the bank provides correct

NEW QUESTION 131
One key aspect of the Office of Foreign Assets Control’s extraterritorial reach includes the blocking of certain non-United States initiated transactions for or through the United States (U.S.) for benefit of a restricted person or entity.
Under which three circumstances are U.S. banks required to block transactions? (Choose three.)

The transactions are to, or go through, a blocked entity

Those that are by, or on behalf of, a blocked individual or entity

Those that are by or on behalf of a blocked individual and a licensed entity

Those that are in connection with a transaction in which a blocked individual or entity has an interest

Those that are in connection with a transaction in which a blocked individual or entity has no interest

NEW QUESTION 132
A compliance officer at an insurance company has been reviewing the transaction activity of several clients.
Which transaction is considered a red flag for potential money laundering?

A client paid the quarterly life insurance premium using money orders from two different banks.

A client from a high-risk jurisdiction recently purchased property insurance for a real-estate development.

A corporation owns several affiliates and recently opened separate group life insurance policies for each of the affiliates.

A client established a $100,000 charitable annuity with a non-profit organization that provides health and safety assistance internationally.

NEW QUESTION 133
Combating the Financing of Terrorism (CFT)]
A compliance officer at a financial institution (FI) received an investigation request for a customer from a local law enforcement agency. Which action should be taken by the FI?

Obtain approval from the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) before submitting the customer’s information.

Omit some responses to meet the regulatory deadline.

Assign employees responsible for the customer to the investigation team.

Consider retaining qualified, experienced legal counsel.

NEW QUESTION 134
To understand if the customer operates in line with the firm’s risk appetite for a specific industry segment, a financial institution must:

obtain sufficient customer information to understand the nature and purpose of customer relationships for the purpose of developing a customer risk profile.

obtain identifying information for beneficial owners through a completed certification form from the individual opening the account on behalf of the legal entity customer.

obtain the name and address, country identification number and date of birth of a non-customer who purchases a monetary instrument.

obtain the name, date of birth for an individual, address and identification number from each customer before opening the account.

Customer due diligence (CDD) is a key component of anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing (CTF) compliance. CDD helps financial institutions identify and verify their customers, assess their risk levels, and monitor their transactions for suspicious activity.
One of the main objectives of CDD is to understand the nature and purpose of customer relationships, which involves collecting and analyzing relevant information about the customer’s business activities, expected transaction patterns, source and destination of funds, and beneficial ownership. This information helps financial institutions develop a customer risk profile, which is a tool to measure and manage the risk exposure of each customer.
A customer risk profile reflects the financial institution’s risk appetite, which is the level and type of risk that the institution is willing and able to accept. By comparing the customer’s risk profile with the institution’s risk appetite, the institution can determine if the customer operates in line with the firm’s expectations and requirements for a specific industry segment. For example, if the institution has a low risk appetite for customers involved in high-risk sectors such as gambling, cryptocurrency, or arms trade, it can use the customer risk profile to identify and mitigate any potential risks associated with such customers.
Therefore, to understand if the customer operates in line with the firm’s risk appetite for a specific industry segment, a financial institution must obtain sufficient customer information to understand the nature and purpose of customer relationships for the purpose of developing a customer risk profile.
References:
A Guide to Customer Due Diligence for Financial Institutions
Customer Due Diligence Guide: Main Requirements, Best Practices & Checklist Financial Crimes Enforcement Network Issues New Frequently Asked Questions on Customer Due Diligence Requirements ACAMS CAMS Certification Study Guide 6th Edition

NEW QUESTION 135
Which insurance product is particularly vulnerable to money laundering?

Annuity

Casualty

Collateral

Regulated pension

ACAMS CAMS (Certified Anti-Money Laundering Specialists) Certification Exam is an internationally recognized credential that validates an individual’s knowledge and expertise in the field of anti-money laundering (AML) and financial crime prevention. Certified Anti-Money Laundering Specialists certification exam is designed to test the competency of professionals who are responsible for detecting, preventing, and reporting money laundering activities in their respective organizations.

Accurate & Verified 2025 New CAMS Answers As Experienced in the Actual Test!: https://www.practicematerial.com/CAMS-exam-materials.html

Leave a Reply Cancel reply